SERIOUS LIBEL AGAINST PRIDDY REFUTED BY AN AUTHOR

Having been accused of a host of lies by across the Internet by the defender (at any cost) of Sathya Sai Baba Gerald 'Joe' Moreno, Robert Priddy was defended by th author Kevin. R.D. Shepherd. Shepherd is strongly against the use of LSD and other such substances and reports on the slander of Moreno against Priddy, especially concerning his experience of LSD-25 in the 1960's as part of an experimental programme by a neurologist working with the approval of the Norwegian Department of Health under Director Karl Evang

"Moreno has sourly attempted to eliminate Priddy from serious consideration by referring in a libellous manner to that retired academic’s long past experimentation (in the 1960s) with LSD, formerly documented by the experimenter in glowing terms. Priddy posted three LSD articles on the web in the 1980s. He has since frowned upon any resort to LSD, and identifies his web testimonies to LSD experimentation in terms of a lack of resolution incurred by devotional thinking. The obsessive anti-Priddy argument of Moreno is not at all convincing, even to those like myself who are strongly opposed to the use of LSD. The defamation has been contested by Martin Alan Kazlev at Moreno Slander against Robert Priddy. In the July 2007 update to my original Wikipedia Issues webpage, I took exception to the Kevin Shepherd and Robert Priddy slur that Moreno had just begun to promote on one of his pseudonymous blogs bearing the name of Equalizer. On the same blog Moreno had entered two early compositions of Priddy about LSD, and was misrepresenting him. Those articles were eulogistic of psychedelic experiences but contained clear warnings, including the statement: “all psycho-chemicals of this nature should be avoided.” I made a point of telephoning Priddy to ascertain his exact position on LSD, and he assured me that the warnings understate his later phase of deliberation on this subject, occurring after he had written his pro-Sai book Source of the Dream (1994), which also briefly mentions his LSD resort in 1963. Priddy now strongly repudiates that book and his phase of subscription to the claims of Sathya Sai Baba (lasting until the late 1990s). He told me that he had eliminated his LSD articles (three in all) from his website because he needed the space for more important matters relating to Sathya Sai, and also because he no longer rated the articles. Moreno has proffered a very inaccurate version of my remarks in his offensive item Kevin R.D. Shepherd and Robert Priddy’s Praise of his LSD-Induced Hallucinations. He there says that I “selectively cited a few lukewarm anti-drug comments by Robert Priddy” but discrepantly adds that I failed to cite or link to the LSD articles. The anti-drug comments come from those articles. There was no need to link, as those articles were in evidence on the Moreno blog to which I linked. Moreno omits the basic context, which comprised my objection to his libellous and anonymous blog sathyasaibaba at wordpress.com. Lack of context is a frequent failing in Moreno blogtalk. The pro-Sai activist made a further incursion upon due context, asserting that “he (Shepherd) is willing to compromise his anti-drug views by defending Robert Priddy’s pro-drug articles.” Pro-Sai activism engenders excessive distortion and misinterpretation. I have not compromised any anti-drug view in resisting the sectarian attempt at libel of Priddy. I have no affinity with the content of Priddy’s LSD articles, though he added due warnings and has not ingested LSD for many years. To be an anti-drug exponent is not the same thing as being an unjust attacker compatible with the preserve of cult libel in which Moreno specialises. There are many senior academics who took drugs such as LSD in their early years, and it would be morally wrong to censure them for something that happened so long ago. The applicable context of my remarks can here be further exhumed from the grave created by Moreno subversion. For instance, the July 2007 update included my complaint that Joe Moreno had asserted: “his (Shepherd’s) reference to Robert Priddy’s anti-Sai propaganda is highly suspect, non-credible and obviously poorly researched.” This matter had nothing to do with LSD articles, but pertained to the Wikipedia quote that Moreno had disputed on his Wikipedia User page (22.1 above). The bone of contention here was the 1993 bedroom murders. Everything about Priddy must be wrong, according to the sectarian argument, and so anyone who references Priddy is likewise in error and guilty of poor research. Only sectarians are good researchers in this desultory argument, despite the fact that they opt for libel as a defence mechanism. (A noticeable subcurrent to the LSD issue is Moreno’s accusation that Priddy once “stole” his webpage titles, keywords, metatags, and javascripts. Whereas Priddy emphasises that Moreno has frequently appropriated and reproduced copyrighted materials of his without gaining due permission, including the LSD articles. From another source, I have recently learned that international legal consultants have been in agreement that Moreno portrayals of ex-devotees and critics amount to serious libels). The acute aversion of Gerald Joe Moreno to Robert Priddy is notoriously associated with the appearance of Priddy website details on a porn site. Some ex-devotees say that nobody else but Moreno (or a very close colleague of his) could have been responsible for this form of stigma, as no other party would be interested in misrepresenting Priddy. That argument is very difficult to avoid, though Moreno denied the accusation in his renewed offensive in my direction. He stated the absence of proof that he was the party responsible. However, he also asserted his inclination to believe that Priddy himself was responsible for the porn site event, and that Priddy wished to use the porn site as a means of promotion. While it is true enough that there is no actual proof of Moreno’s engagement in this unsavoury activity, his argument as a whole is very unconvincing and remains a factor for strong suspicion. Moreno’s evident desire to implicate Priddy in porn site activity is viewed by ex-devotees as a dubious factor casting substantial doubt upon his (Moreno’s) declared innocence. With more justification, the sectarian has emphasised incongruous remarks of his opponent Reinier Van Der Sandt in relation to child pornography. However, Moreno has used those remarks in an attempt to implicate others (including myself) as being in error. I disowned that matter in the Response to Moreno (November 2007), which the apologist has not acknowledged (see 22.9 below). I am not responsible for any remark made by ex-devotees or their affiliates, being an outsider to that contingent. My complaint about a Wikipedia User page, and an attendant cordon exerted by Moreno in Wikipedia, has been obsessively misrepresented on the primary Moreno website in terms of something quite different. Sectarian polemic is seriously flawed." from Kevin Shepherd's page  http://www.kevinrdshepherd.net/html/22__wikipedia___moreno__google.html

The Sathya Sai Organization's sponsored Internet Spokesman, Gerald 'Joe' Moreno

Gerald 'Joe' Moreno who once did his best to disguise the fact that he lives in Las Cruces, New Mexico, - wrote a self-flattering self-promotional advertisement for his pro-Sathya Sai Baba web site - which is directed one-sidedly and exclusively against the critics of Sathya Sai Baba (using one of his known pseudonyms with a link to his own website) - as follows:

"joe108: Actually, many people simply have not cared to sort through all the muck regarding Sathya Sai Baba and try to find the unbiased truth. This is the best site that gives an honest, sincere and open view regarding Sathya Sai Baba." (Search joe108 on Google to confirm the identification)

'Honest, sincere, open and unbiased' are adjectives that no reasonable person would attribute to Gerald 'Joe' Moreno's web sites and board postings. All who visit them will come across defamatory dirt he promotes to try to blacken some of those with whom he disagrees and relentlessly pursues. He is also an unashamed flamer and user of libel on bulletin boards across the Internet against virtually all of the hundreds of Sai critics, who he always lumps together as 'Anti-Sai' people to make them appear as all of the same opinion on all the issues and are always acting in collusion with each other. This tarring everyone with the same brush and is calculated calumny, as is his calling many of Sai Baba's critics 'liars' [obviously without proof]. Critics include over 100 respected, long-time former devotees who have tried to raise their concerns with the top leadership of the Sathya Sai Organization, without response.

The Predominant Internet spokesman in defense of the Sathya Sai Organization

This public excrescence - the websites of Gerald Moreno - is to be regarded as an outgrowth of the Sathya Sai Organisation in that it is the only pro-Sai and pro-Organisation mouthpiece against critics on the Internet. Gerald Moreno tried to cover his tracks as a firm closet believer in Sathya Sai Baba and stubborn supporter of his organization, whose authoritarian leaders and structures he does not ever question in the slightest, on the contrary. From the start he put a disclaimer on every single web page stating that he is not a devotee and not a member of the Sai Organization. Though he is surely not a formal member, in realisty this is patently a pre-emptive smokescreen to try to absove his frenzied opus which from the start constantly defended both Sai and his organisation more fanatically than any other devotee or member ever has! Recently, he was still protesting to a critic who outed him on this: "Another sad speculation you make is when you call me a SSB devotee. I am not a SSB devotee. I truthfully state that I have had many wonderful and positive experiences with SSB, as I have had with many other spiritual personalities." (check this, if desired, at www.saisathyasai.com/baba/emails-sanjay-dadlani.html). It is just a matter of mere words and definition, and Moreno has no respect for the states of affairs that many words and definitions represent whenever it so suits him.

Of course, Moreno cannot possibly square his repeated defamation and vicious harassments with the teachings of any spiritual teachers he speaks of having had contact with! This denial of association with the Sathya Sai Organization is part of his cunning but failed strategy from the outset to work hell bent to defend whatever it stands for and does. Moreno protested his independence just too much for credibility! Like devotees everywhere, Moreno knows perfectly well that Sai Baba has said that the Organization that bears his name is Divine, and is his chief instrument through which he will save the world. But Moreno failed to conceal his contact with the Sai Organization hierarchy, whose pathway connects not least through the Sai devotee attorney Robert M. Baskin of Ventura, California, who has long been a key legal advisor to the Sai Organization. On his home page at vishvarupa.com, Moreno confessed his connection with Robert since he introduced Moreno to Sai Baba . His writings show how much he is a willing instrument of the Sai Organization and he has shown that he is their only outlet for private video depositions which are unobtainable elsewhere to anyone. The Sai Organization on their behalf have no quarrel with him, none at all. In fact, in India they are now linking to his lowlife website, which proves their complicity with him! (Take note, other crucial documentary evidence in this matter, attested by a former inside source, is being withheld here for future use for eventual use in litigation or by researchers from serious world media).

This involvement of Moreno with the Sathya Sai Organization is further reinforced. In answer to a recent posting on ExBaba.com questioning the donation of five new, expensive cars to five 'Sai VIPs', Moreno stated that he has met such 'elevated', normally unapproachable persons within the Sai hierarchy as Directors of the Board of the Sathya Sai Central Trust, like Mr. K. Chakravarti K. Chakravarthi, who is Head of the Prashanthi Nilayam ashram and Secretary of the Sathya Sai Central Trust and Dr G. Venkataraman, the deputy chairman of the Prashanti Council and head of the international Radio Sai.

Moreno's clandestine contact with Sai people: Such as Robert M. Baskin of California, who is a self-serving lawyer who has for decades managed to his own pecuniary advantage the massive funds that have been sent to India by the Sathya Sai Society of the U.S. and who defends it in a legal capacity. He is known to close colleagues never to donate anything himself. (Apropos, at one point it was widely known that he was excluded from the US Organization by Dr. Michael Goldstein, but Sathya Sai Baba forced Goldstein to readmit him.

He was reportedly a shabbily dressed, impecunious young man when he first went to Sathya Sai in 1978. Sai Baba showered attention on him, 'manifesting' a silver ring with his image on it. Within hours, Baskin was summarily scrubbed up and looked after as to clothing, housing and other necessities, and allowed rare privileges, such as being able to enter Sai Baba's house. It seems he had had what Sai Baba calls 'Good Chances' to the full! He was later virtually 'forced' by Sathya Sai (i.e. whose word he believed to be Divine Law) into marriage with an older and divorced woman, Diane, in 1978. Diane had been married by Sai baba himself to Joel Riordan, who turned out very badly, according to Diane in her book. Sai Baba showered attention on Robert Baskin, 'manifesting' a silver ring with his image on it for him. Within hours, Baskin was summarily scrubbed up and looked after as to clothing, housing and other necessities, and allowed rare privileges, such as being able to enter Sai Baba's house. Diane Baskin also details this episode in her book 'Divine Memories of Sathya Sai Baba'. Later, she filed in a California law court for divorce against him, but afterwards withdrew this!) Robert M. Baskin is regarded as a smart lawyer and has done so well for himself that he built a million dollar residence in Ojai some years ago.

Moreno was the first person outside the court to obtain any facts about the case against the Sathya Sai Society in which Robert M. Baskin was involved, being the Sathya Sai Society's long-standing lawyer. Moreno obtained not only the Court Records in record time, but also the private depositions by the Sathya Sai Society which were never public documents and which remain unavailable from the Clerk of Court. They can only have been provided to Moreno by the lawyers involved! When the accountability of the Sathya Sai Society was questioned on Wikipedia, Moreno responded within hours stating the details of this society's origin etc., which information on otherwise obscure details indicates his close connection with Sai organization leaders. The deposition contains a false defamatory allegation against the mother of Alaya Rahm. We also note here that the 100% biased testimony by Kreydick also confirms that Alaya was paid money by Sathya Sai Baba, as he has claimed was given for him to keep quiet. Kreydick also states that he saw Alaya sit on Sai Baba's lap! Robert M. Baskin was an active proponent of the Sathya sai Society in these matters.

As proof of Moreno's close connivance with and acceptance by Sathya Sai Organisation leaders in their cover-up is that his presentation of Alaya Rahm's self-dismissed court case was accepted by the official Sathya Sai Baba website http://www.saibabaofindia.com/truth_always_triumphs.html (cached also here ) here), as well as by Radio Sai, which broadcasts to many parts of the world. The 'heart-to-heart' e-mailers connected to the official 'Radio Sai' mail-bombed devotees and even exposé activists with this information. This is endorsement by the official Sai hierarchy of this self-exhibiting, abusive, libellous person who will stop at nothing (see a fragment of the evidence by clicking here, and here, and here). Sathya Sai Organization leaders have descended into the gutter by proxy! They have tried to make a mountain of proof out of a molehill of subjective evidence in a deposition in the Rahm case which was not even heard by the court, because the case was self-dismissed on technical legal grounds of not finding an accountable incorporated organisational body which could be made responsible for Alaya Rahm's having gone to Sai Baba or what happened to him at all. This they present as a victory, doubtless so as further to deceive Sai devotees into not leaving and reducing donations.

Moreno's involvment with the Sathya Sai Organization is further shown by his having claimed to have met (such 'elevated', normally unapproachable persons within the Sai hierarchy as) Directors of the Board of the Sathya Sai Central Trust, like K. Chakravarthi, who is Head of the Prashanthi Nilayam ashram and Secretary of the Sathya Sai Central Trust and Dr G. Venkataraman, the deputy chairman of the Prashanti Council and head of the international Radio Sai. Moreno mentioned them his he did in answer to a recent posting on ExBaba.com questioning the donation of five new, expensive cars to five 'Sai VIPs'. He was the first to know about the case against the Sathya Sai Society in which his friend, the key Sai Organisation defender Robert M. Baskin, was involved. (Take note, other crucial documentary evidence of this connection attested by a former inside source is being withheld here for future use for possible use in litigation or by researchers from major responsible, well-researched media).

Further, Moreno has explained how he has had contact with the President of the UK Sathya Sai Organization, Ashok Bhagani, in his attempt to cover-up their proven false Internet claim about a meeting at Westminster Cathedral (see http://www.saisathyasai.com/baba/Ex-Baba.com/News/april-2005.html). Here is yet another proof of his working with the Sathya Sai Organisation in their cover-up of their false propaganda about a meeting in Westminster Cathedral which never took place.

The Sathya Sai Organization's Gutter Fighter's Tricks

What is perhaps most disgusting about Moreno and his backers is how he fronts a concerted attack on all the sexually abused ex-followers and backing his vilifying 'Sai devotee' companions on Yahoo groups. Constantly and in great volume demonstrating every logical fallacy in the book, this immoral nonentity denies or twists documented facts beyond recognition simply to muddy the issue and sling mud at hundreds of ex-devotees who have learned the truth and spoken out.

Moreno, for all his show of presenting a well-nigh encyclopedic collection of facts, presents virtually nothing but vague, sweeping generalizations. He repeatedly falsifies and demeans others' viewpoints and postings, and follows no checkable backup procedure. He studiously avoids - often through dwelling on side issues - all important and documented facts and arguments, instead attacking, harassing and literally stalking those who state them. One trick of his has been to write to a few leading former devotees who, because of the danger of having their words up on the Internet usually within hours and often distorted, have not replied. "Joe" then derides them for not replying to him, stating that this proves they are liars or whatever else he falsely accuses them of. When two (atypically) responded to him nearly as rudely as he invariably ends up being himself, he immediately displayed their replies in yet one more of many attempts to tarnish the good standing of former devotees by association as 'the Anti-Sai group'. Typical demagogy! He likes variously to style his opponents as fascists, anti-Semites, paedophiles, and especially as fundamentalist Christians, when the active exposé members are absolutely none of these things and no evidence exists as such (some are Christian, some agnostics, some Hindus, some Muslims, some New Age interested and so on, but none of the main exposé activists are any kind of 'fundamentalist'. It is Sathya Sai Baba who is the real scripture-bnashing fundamentalist.

Gerald Moreno has spent many hundreds of hours trying to demonize and slur to the fullest extent of his stunted logical and sub-rational abilities, the ex-devotee Sanjay Dadlani and the webmaster of ExBaba.com, Reinier van der Sandt. (Enter any of these names together with Moreno in Google and see the proof). This is apart from his extensive attacks occupying hundreds more web pages and board postings on Sai critics like Basava Premanand, Alaya Rahm and family, Brian Steel, Robert Priddy, Alexandra Nagel, Barry Pittard, Glen Meloy, Alan Kazlev, the owner of this website and an extended list of others too. He accuses virtually all who disagree with him as being liars, but without any proof or evidence, and - as a double smokescreen - he calls anyone who writes critically about him a defamer- he whose main business is libel and lies!

Reflections on the Character of cyber-stalker Gerald Moreno

Firstly, his own behavior and denigatory language reflect fully on himself to show what he is. As if to convince himself that his own beliefs about Sathya Sai Baba have validity, Joe attacks with insupportable claims and slurs anything negative that is documented and testified about Sathya Sai Baba. Small minds have small thoughts... and Moreno has them in abundance, vile and vindictive too. Plainly speaking, Moreno shares this with his yet more moronic protégé - the vituperative and venom-fanged Lisa De Witt - who posts under various pseudonyms including 'consciousobjector2000'. She has to her name an unending stream of the crudest libels, contrived lies and utterly senseless accusations on Yahoo groups and other boards relating to Sathya Sai Baba (search Google). Moreno and De Witt support each other in mutual admiration in numerous postings. No level is too base for De Witt to stoop to, as those who search for her postings will discover, and Moreno has publicly stated he will "go as low" as anyone (and he goes to the lowest level)! Is this quite what the "spiritual teachers" he extols advise?

Moreno's type of attention-seeking behavior - a telling sign of inferiority feelings - is surpassed only by his patent moral cowardice. He fears to stand forth like a man and provide a single controllable detail that he is who he says he is, while stalking and harassing others who were not afraid to stand forth for the world, and at great personal cost. . He has failed to present any qualifications, or admit to any trade or profession, he may have and refuses time and again to give away any details about himself, such as phone number or address, unlike the most prominent spokespersons for organized former devotees. Many readers would easily see that his evaluative ability and logic are below high school graduation level.

Moreno is a sheep hiding in wolf's clothing who suffers from the follower syndrome in needing a mental dependency on the authority of criminal swamis (i.e. 'Baa-baa'!). In keeping with his defense of Sai Baba, Moreno is also still a strong promoter of the murdering rapist Swami Premananda, who was convicted on extensive forensic evidence (both from India and overseas forensic experts) and who therefore languishes in prison in India on a double life sentence, even after all appeals against the ruling were turned down by the Supreme Court of India. Then, of course, by his own admission on his home page, "Joe" Moreno was oiled on the "lower stomach" by Sathya Sai Baba (i.e. the devious way Sai people say refer to what is known to all, actually in the pubic and genital area). This ambivalence would help to explain why Gerald Moreno is in total denial. It Is doubtful whether he would be honest or daring enough to submit his own account to competent psychological and legal professionals, as have a number of those who were "oiled" by Sathya Sai Baba.

Gerald Moreno WAS sexually molested, whatever he now wants to believer about it!

Gerald Moreno was treated in patent defiance of Indian law by Sathya Sai Baba, who is not a doctor of medicine, but who oiled him on his (naked) "lower stomach" with some kind of oil. whatever he now wants to believer about it! He is but one of very many who have described this, and often also the follow-up sexual advances and intercourse with SB... testified in signed documents and affidavits by young men from around the world. His own description of how he was - though not realising it then - groomed for possible sex by Sathya Sai Baba through invasive and illegal "oiling on the lower stomach" in a private interview. He also tells how it affected his sexuality, reducing his desire for sex considerably, which is explainable after such a traumatic kind of event - being oiled and corrected by one believed to be God Incarnate!

He admits in postings that he was seeking God in India and came through what he took as miraculous events to Sathya Sai Baba.  He tells how he was confused by the oiling episode,and had no idea what the oiling meant. He later came to consider Sathya Sai Baba to be a sexual abuser - YET HE CONTINUED FOR YEARS TO DEFEND HIM TO THE HILT! Having so done - and because it was pointed out how contradictory and grossly immoral and hypocritical his position was, he took the first opportunity to change his mind (when Dr. Goldstein of the Sathya Sai Organization evaded prosecution in a US Court for aiding and covering up for Sathya Sai Baba in the alleged sexual abuses).

Leo Rebello filth-libel promoted by G. Moreno

I (Robert Priddy) have been grossly misrepresented on the Internet by a pro-Sai Baba troll and web stalker, Gerald Joe Moreno.  According to Moreno, the (self-proclaimed 'Doctor, PhD.) Leo Rebello had once threatened to sue me for a million dollars for exposing his libel and defamations against the Australian authoress Mary Garden etc. is entirely false. He threatened a free web server (angeltowns - which had posted my views), not me! 
I was further misrepresented by the Sai Baba Internet troll and web-stalker Moreno as having written the text which appears on the e-mail from Leo Rebello below (full raw source data given at foot of this blog):- 
Note: some e-mail addresses have been removed from the message headings for protection against spam, hate mails from the self-promitngwould-be Nobel 'peace prize candidate' and Indian President, Leo Rebello etc.

----- Original Message -----

From: DR. LEO REBELLO

To: Robert Priddy

Cc: r.v.d.s@hetnet.nl ; dkk@yahoo.com

Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:09 AM

Subject: HOMOSEXUAL, drug addict, VAGABOND, bastard ROBERT PRIDDY

 LISTEN ROBERT PRIDDY - I DO NOT HAVE TO LEARN COMMUNCATION SKILLS FROM A NITWIT LIKE YOU. I HAVE WRITTEN 26 BOOKS, SOME HAVE BEEN TRANSLATED INTO OTHER LANGUAGES, SOME HAVE GONE IN MULTIPLE EDITIONS. I HAVE WRITTEN SEVERAL ARTICLES, SCIENTIFIC PAPERS, POEMS, SHORT STORIES, ETC. I HAVE ALSO TAUGHT AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL - AS PROFESSOR AND HEAD OF THE DEPTT. AND GUIDE DOCTORAL AND POST DOCTORAL STUDENTS AND I KNOW HOW TO HANDLE MENTALLY DERANGED PERSONS LIKE YOU...

 
I HAVE HIT THE NAIL RIGHT ON YOUR HEAD ROBERT PRIDDY. ALL OF YOU AT EX BABA COM ARE INDEED HOMOSEXUALS, DRUG ADDICTS OR VAGABONDS. BABA HAS FUCKED MOST OF YOU AND/OR YOU HAVE LICKED HIS ARSEHOLE OR URINE PIPE. THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE FIT FOR. IS YOUR SERPENT STILL RISING

ON SEEING MARY GARDEN OR ANY OTHER WOMAN?

 NOW GO AND MASTURBATE ELSEWHERE IF YOUR TOOL IS STILL WORKING. I HAD NOT WRITTEN TO YOU AND YOU HAVE NO BUSINESS TO WRITE THE NONSENSE THAT YOU WROTE TO ME. YOU ARE BLOCKED AS I DO NOT WISH TO HEAR FROM AN ARSEHOLE. FRANKLY, DR. LEO REBELLO

---

This elicited the following reply from which e-mail addresses have been removed from the message headings for protection against spam, hate mails from the self-promitngwould-be Nobel 'peace prize candidate' and Indian President, Leo Rebello etc.)

----- Original Message -----

From: Robert Priddy

To: DR. LEO REBELLO

Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 12:42 AM

Subject: Re: MORALLY ROTTEN, SPIRITUALLY HANDICAPPED WWW.EXBABA.COM PEOPLE

Rebello, You are certainly not gifted with any communicative skills. We owe you no explanation of any kind. You wrote Ex Baba net comes across as a club of homosexuals, drug addicts and vagabonds.  This seems to typify of your usual irrational wishful thinking. Do you expect us to lap up your urinating like a mad dog on us? You need to clean out your mind and your mouth with the strongest possible detergents.You have shown you ARE a slanderer of the worst order, a filthy one, and we will have NOTHING WHATEVER to do with you or your twisted ideas. From now on your e+mails do not reach us, they are blocked at the server automatically. Which part of God do you reckon you are, the filthy part?

It seems fairly evident that Leo Rebello's fine words and sweet talk on various websites and in his 'lectures' etc. - apparently held wherever he can get his foot in the door - must amount to little more than empty words, for he has bared his heart as harbouring the kind of hate and spite seen in these mails. Evidently having grown too big for his boots, Rebello has allowed his anger to flow forth freely and at length in the misconception that it would be without any consequences for him. The self-proclaimed 'ambassador od peace' who boast he was 'born to heal the world' has not held his cards close enough to his chest this time. It is interesting to speculate whether Rebello imagines he was winning any favour with those to whom he has sent his mails along with please for support for him! That a person who has so many contacts around the world is so blind and untutored is really quite a wonder. In civilised society, insults of the sheer number and depth of depravity which he has achieved are considered without exception to be the product of a deranged person, or as coming from the lowest of the low strata of humanity. It shows how and where, by what values, a person was brought up. The amount of sheer aggression that kept him contriving such filth (many more such e-mails sent with deafening overtones of a sexually unhealthy fixation) indicates moral and spiritual duplicity.

Return-Path: Received: from smtp2.vsnl.net (smtp2.vsnl.net [203.200.235.232]) by mail25.nsc.no (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA02671 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:00:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from leorebello ([127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.vsnl.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.16 (built May 14 2003)) with SMTP id <0hpx00fuai6ztp smtp2.vsnl.net=""> for rpriddy@online.no; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:27:33 +0530 (IST) Received: from ([219.65.47.102]) by smtp2.vsnl.net (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall Unix); Mon, 15 Dec 2003 14:27:33 +0530 (IST) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:39:14 +0530 From: "DR. LEO REBELLO" Subject: HOMOSEXUAL, drug addict, VAGABOND, bastard ROBERT PRIDDY To: Robert Priddy Cc: r.v.d.sandt@hetnet.nl, dark_knight_9@yahoo.com Message-id: <034601c3c2eb d73940="" f="" vsnl.net.in=""> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_84yx2aEhoOFQcRPBICw7Cw)" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-priority: Normal References: <001401c3c26b c03824e0="" f="" vsnl.net.in=""> <003101c3c276 a96fea9="" c30020="" desktop=""> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_84yx2aEhoOFQcRPBICw7Cw) Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT LISTEN ROBERT PRIDDY - I DO NOT HAVE TO LEARN COMMUNCATION SKILLS FROM A NITWIT LIKE YOU. I HAVE WRITTEN 26 BOOKS, SOME HAVE BEEN TRANSLATED INTO OTHER LANGUAGES, SOME HAVE GONE IN MULTIPLE EDITIONS. I HAVE WRITTEN SEVERAL ARTICLES, SCIENTIFIC PAPERS, POEMS, SHORT STORIES, ETC. I HAVE ALSO TAUGHT AT UNIVERSITY LEVEL - AS PROFESSOR AND HEAD OF THE DEPTT. AND GUIDE DOCTORAL AND POST DOCTORAL STUDENTS AND I KNOW HOW TO HANDLE MENTALLY DERANGED PERSONS LIKE YOU... I HAVE HIT THE NAIL RIGHT ON YOUR HEAD ROBERT PRIDDY. ALL OF YOU AT EX BABA COM ARE INDEED HOMOSEXUALS, DRUG ADDICTS OR VAGABONDS. BABA HAS FUCKED MOST OF YOU AND/OR YOU HAVE LICKED HIS ARSEHOLE OR URINE PIPE. THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE FIT FOR. IS YOUR SERPENT STILL RISING ON SEEING MARY GARDEN OR ANY OTHER WOMAN? NOW GO AND MASTURBATE ELSEWHERE IF YOUR TOOL IS STILL WORKING. I HAD NOT WRITTEN TO YOU AND YOU HAVE NO BUSINESS TO WRITE THE NONSENSE THAT YOU WROTE TO ME. YOU ARE BLOCKED AS I DO NOT WISH TO HEAR FROM AN ARSEHOLE. FRANKLY, DR. LEO REBELLO

Gerald Moreno's constant smears - a discredit to Sathya Sai Baba

Gerald Joe Moreno (ALIASES joe108. SSS108, GM108, JM 108. EQUALIZER etc.) is a Sathya Sai Baba admirer who has become the front man on the Internet for defending Sai Baba and all still connected with him. He has been very active trying to smear all ex-followers, dissidents and critics of Sai Baba since 2004. More recently (2008 onwards) his main targets have responded to his countless web pages and blogs so as to show at least some of the fanaticism, denial and deception he engages in on a full-time basis, having no known educational qualifications or employment.

As an example of the twentieth-century version of Gresham’s law, Moreno works - without knowing it - on the principle is that information tends to drive knowledge out of circulation. He provides masses of information of a degraded quality - especially detail without overview, avoidance of issues through concentrating mainly on side-issues and cranky digressions surely hoping to avoid mentioning anything that goes against his views. On the urging of others who are his constant targets, I have since rebutted a number of his attacks on myself and them and highlighted his defense of injustice, deception, fraud, sex abuses and murder cover-ups in a series of my own blogs. See photo and contact details etc. here


Moreno exposed by his former friendly supporter: After first being positive towards Moreno' s untruths, he has been shunned, the best single example being M. Alan Kazlev, who has refuted Moreno most thoroughly since he realised his original mistake. Of course, Moreno has also attacked him relentlessly and untruthfully on a large scale in web pages, blogs and more. Obviously, the factual exposé web sites and blogs have caused the disillusionment of very many who have been misled, while hundreds of former devotees - including a large number of former office-bearers and major followers in the Sathya Sai Organization) have signed a petition calling for the public investigation of Sathya Sai Baba and his organization (over 1300 signatories so far). After first being positive towards Moreno' s untruths, he has been shunned, the best single example being M. Alan Kazlev, who has refuted Moreno most thoroughly since he realised his original mistake. Predictably, Moreno also attacks him relentlessly in diverse web sites and blogs.


His persistent fault-finding where there really are no faults of any significance is taken to hair-splitting extremes. He has all the petulant fervour of one who knows that he is in the wrong. Moreno gives many pages on-line to his primitive demagogic deceit tactics, which emulate the most right-wing US Republicans' cheap attack methods. regardless of all the evidence to the contrary Moreno's obvious 'agenda' is to cast doubt on me as excessively as he can contrive regardless of all the evidence to the contrary.

The following list of symptoms of deep mental-emotional denial and fanatical fixation on enemies with strong obsessional and paranoid features are indicated by Moreno's constant harassing obloquy:


1) A main agenda of character assassination and ad hominem arguments, with repetitive challenges of 'blatant or shameless lying' without a morsel of reasonable proof, as I have explained here.

2) The systematic and meticulous use of dubious "documentation' and refusal to accept official documentation disproving him definitively (egs. a) the Hislop letters controversy, b) the State Department warning on Sai Baba, c) the fact of a Supreme Court petition against Sai Baba d) the many attacks he made on Basava Premanand... as some of the many instances).

3) Wilful avoidance of issues Moreno has most assiduously failed to confront or even mention many of the main issues showing Sathya Sai Baba to talk nonsense, make false predictions, demonstrate huge ignorance of relatively simple science, geology, physics, history and many other items which are so well documented and so obvious that neither Moreno or anyone can raise any kind of defense against my and others' points.

4) Truncating or omitting keywords in his quotations, which are invariably also faultily interpreted according to Moreno's determination to try to prove Priddy is a liar, a latent homosexual, a 'dirty old man' (purposely confusing me with Sathya Sai Baba?) and whatever he sees fit to use as a slur... none of which is true or is more than mud-slinging.

5) Making taunts and jibes of a schoolyard or comic strip mentality: Some examples: distorting my name to Mr. Priddles, addressing me "Heil, Priddy", characterising his chosen enemies' responses to his comments including "frothing at the mouth", "whines", "snivels" and "moans" and numerous tendentious adjectives. His heading to one defamatory and hatched up web page he has about me is, "The Priddy and not so Priddy sides to Robert Priddy" This is his kind of reasoning altogether! [Note: he claimed in his FAQ to be a neutral observer!


6) Misrepresentation of others' views He has repeatedly particularly misrepresented me as if I still stand for views which I have long left behind and refuted clearly in public. This he knows since he is my most devoted reader, judging by how he finds even a letter or a comma out of place! He constantly distorts what I stand for through biased selections and major or minor omissions, presenting my former views on Sai Baba as if they were valid and I am thuse in self-contradiction or confusion... which I certainly no longer am on these matters. He neglects to mention my modified views on so-called elemental (like earth spirits, succubi and other psychic phenomena - which see here)


7) Reversing many allegations and claims made by dissidents to claim the same or similar against them. [Egs. he has put great effort into attempts to tie all critics of Sathya Sai Baba together into one homogenous group "the anti-Sais" which he also characterised as a cult! (They are all anti-cultists, but Moreno persists in reversing every claim they make against Sai Baba or himself to level it against them. Thus he reversed the widespread allegations that Sathya Sai Baba is a pedophile by calling Barry Pittard a 'pedophile' (he had to withdraw that under jeopardy of litigation, but he did so without the simplest apology! See Serious Defamation Attempt By Gerald Moreno Defeated. By the 7-person Working Committee of the JuST Group ). After it had been pointed out that Moreno was, according to Indian law, sexually molested by Sathya Sai Baba, he has done his worst to insinuate that I may also have been sexually molested... by Sai Baba! Which is of course totally untrue - I have never been to a private interview without my wife's attendance and I was 50 when the first one took place, which disqualifies me entirely).

8) Infringement of copyright images and whole articles - and further manipulating dissident's photos [Egs. Vile uses of an photo of Sanjay Dadlani, a childish alteration to an image of Reinier van der Sandt, highly tendentious presentations of images of Conny Larsson. Also he posted without permission images of me and my son, and has also distorted a photo of my face in an attempt to ridicule me. For example, he also posted a copyright photo from my published book - annotating it and making false descriptions of some of the objects seen there.] He was forced due to proven copyright infringement to remove a copy of one of my articles from his wordpress blog, whereupon he reposted it on several other sites which do not respect copyright infringements!

9) Sabotage by anonymous and false submissions to the Sai petition


10) Posting anonymously about a critic on numerous pornographic websites. (See Link)

11) Constant and massive web stalking of critics, their families, their associates, their friends, any e-mail address associated with them he can discover through helpers (Irene Strindhed). He attacks Conny Larsson, Barry Pittard's family, Kevin R.D. Shepherd and his mother and many others, writing web pages and separate blogs to smear them. He has religiously hunted down all he can find about dozens of other critics - even including Wikipedia contributors and administrators, so as to smear them, some of his targets not being personally in the Sai Baba issue).


12) Constantly making wrong assumptions to favour his case and presenting them as fact (SWARA) Egs: Moreno tries to deny that Sai Baba made his revealing pre-Mumbai prediction of no fear of bombs - see Sai Baba bomb claim demolishes his credibility.

13) Casting doubts on facts or outright denials of them or their accuracy.

a) He questioned whether I wrote all the articles in Sanathana Sarathi I reported I did - mostly written on pressing request of the editor, V.K. Narasimhan - see here),

b) He questioned the Priddy's considerable financial donations to Sathya Sai Baba (see here)

c) and denied my close relationship and countless private conversations with V.K. Narasimhan but to set the record straight, I provided scans of some of the many letters I received from Narasimhan and by extensive scans of daily diary entries made at the time recording much of the information I received from him.

d) He contested whether I was not a national leader in the Sathya Sai organization (but see here),

e) He makes various assertions on the state of my health claiming I suffer from senile dementia see Moreno's 'senile dementia' slurs & irrationality - and widely publicising a most infamous Indian crank's infamous claim that Priddy was dying of AIDS already in 2002 (Leo Rebello), and himself and many more similar inventions).

f) He claimed (on Wikipedia, before he was (with username SSS108) indefinitely banned from it by an unanimous panel of administrators - see here) that my writings in sociology and philosophy had never been referenced by anyone, but later this was disproved by source references (see Robert.C.Priddy - Wikipedia).

14) Automatic tit-for-tat reactions to comments made by critics of Sai Baba about him: he takes a point about Sathya Sai Baba or more often about himself and claims the same about the one who made the point. There are scores of instances of this, which indicate a stunted mentality lacking insight and real grievances based on factual matters.

a) He runs a massive smear campaign against all dissidents, but he calls all our writings a "smear campaign". Our writings are exposures of many deceptions and are sober indeed compared to his false contrivances, and all our claims are backed up with public testimony, written evidence, circumstantial evidence or personal experiences.

b) Another 'small example': because Sathya Sai Baba has visited and endorsed Idi Amin, also recently, which I pointed out on-line using a composed image first published on ExBaba.com which represents the relationship Sai Baba-Idi Amin-G. Venkataraman, Moreno created an image of me with Idi Amin to create the impression that I endorse Idi Amin, when I have done nothing but expose and deplore Idi Amin (of course!) and in considerable detail. Such a pathetic tit-for-tat attack is Moreno's way to make his dirt to stick somehow.

c) Say that a critic makes the observation that Moreno uses bullying tactics, straightway will come an article referring to how that writer is a bully, and the word "bully" will appear in Moreno's article title.

d) Likewise, Moreno has developed a narrative for himself in which he is the blameless victim of defamation and attacks, yet the blogs etc. to which he refers are only responses first made around 3 years after he had begun his massive harassment and web stalking of dissenters, of critics, their families, their associates, their friends, any e-mail address associated with them he can discover through helpers (eg. Irene Strindhed).

e) Some of his blogs were (very rightly) characterised as "feral attacks", whereupon he arranged for critics' responses to be characterised on a web page as "feral attacks".

15) Demagogic technique of labeling diverse persons and opinions under one heading Moreno strives to mislead the reader by conflating all opinions of all critics under the catch-all phrase 'anti-Sai'. Because I support some of the reports of certain persons, like Dave Lyons, Sanjay Dadlani, Alexander Nagel, M. Alan Kazlev, Conny Larsson, Asa Samsioe and various others, he repeatedly hammers in the false implication that I agree with all and everything they stand for, which is not true at all. I do agree in very large part with their criticisms of Sathya Sai Baba and have found all reason to believe their testimonies. Moreno is a great exponent of attacking the character of a person rather than his arguments - and equally the closely related 'straw man' argument. This fallacy is one of his most basic crutches. The Straw Man fallacy occurs when one ignores a person's actual position and substitutes a distorted, exaggerated or misrepresented version of that position through a false association to other persons or standpoints. (see here) He makes images combining the photos of critics and associating all the one stands for with the other as if they are 'joined at the hip' - yet actually there are very considerable differences between them (I am virtually an atheist, while Dadlani is a Hindu believer, for example).

15) Peevish attempts at 'proofs' of lying by appeal to carefully selected usages given by college and other dictionaries - words like 'colleague (which I used of my friend and colleague in parapsychological matters, Erlendur Haraldsson), of 'professor' when I once used this word (uncapitalized) about myself, but not as a title, just in the general, accepted dictionary sense.' These points hint at his puerile cranky mentality.

16) Bogus claim of neutrality Incredibly, Gerald Moreno has laid claim to being 'neutral' on these issues, not least claiming not to be a follower of Sathya Sai Baba or a believer in his self-professed omnipotence, omniscience or avatarhood. However, he accuses me of exactly what he does himself :- "Robert Priddy cherry-picks his one-way and selective criticisms and whines, snivels and moans about what he perceives as faults, gullibility and mental deficiencies in others, all the while wholly dismissing these same faults in himself and other critic's of Sathya Sai Baba." Moreno conveniently overlooks my many remarks about having been deceived leading to my own consequent errors of judgement, similar to those of many Western devotees. After 2000, when I resigned from the Sathya Sai Organization, those who do not examine the evidence fairly and who continue to support Sathya Sai Baba are very rightly accused of gullibility. There is no longer any valid excuse, such as that which applied in my case before 2000. Moreno overlooks the glaring fact that there are many uneducated and very simple people among the followers of Sai Baba, mostly Indian peasants who have never even been to school, and - as a former Organization leader for 18 years - I can confirm that many people with considerable mental problems are attracted to and are always present at the Sai groups, centres and ashrams.


Moreno also accuses me of "typical, bitter and negative Anti-Sai articles". Note how Moreno's own very words throughout his writings are typical, bitter, negative and antipathetic to me and virtually all of the critics. I agree that my current writings are almost entirely negative about Sathya Sai Baba and so should they be - I have to make up for all the excessive positivity I expressed when I was a follower. I no longer have anything positive to say about Sai Baba after being deceived by him so deeply for so long, and having found him out as an undoubted sexual abuser and murder accomplice. I am not bitter - just very disdainful, who is a fully exposed liar and much worse, so therefore I am no longer interested in any way whatever to promote any good acts Sathya Sai Baba has done. I did too much of that earlier in my book 'Source of the Dream' and in many articles in his journal Sanathana Sarathi (to which Narasimhan reported a constant and considerable positive response, especially by educated persons).

The above points cover some aspects of Gerald Moreno's enormous concentration on my person and writings, always with the intent to discredit anything on any pretext, however remote from what is reasonable or true. He studies my work like the devil studies the Bible! And I am not the only target for his bile, far from it!

The above points cover some aspects of Gerald Moreno's enormous concentration on my person and writings, always with the intent to discredit anything on any pretext, however remote from what is reasonable or true. He studies my work like the devil studies the Bible! And I am not the only target for his bile, far from it!
See

the only photo he posted of himself, which he removed (too late) hoping to hide his face Moreno: anonymity and the dark – or love, light & spirituality? Gerald Moreno’s internet profile and agenda Moreno’s most serious defamation attempt defeated Independent assessment of Moreno_slander_against_Robert_Priddy Concerning alleged anti-Sai Baba deceptions Moreno’s wilful Google-manipulatory disinformation The Gerald Joe Moreno dossier – part 1 The Gerald Moreno dossier – part 2 No 'smear campaign' against Sathya Sai Baba Gerald Moreno's obsessive psychological denial Author admits genital oiling by Sathya Sai Baba Gerald Moreno on homo-erotic fantasies, latent homosexuality Moreno’s ceaseless attacks on Individuals and Institutions critical of Sai Baba Moreno's wildest attack on Priddy? Profile of a web aggressor Further information about Gerald Moreno Gerald Joe Moreno fully exposed as a cyber-terrorist On the collected works of Gerald 'Joe' Moreno' Moreno major distortion of Basava Premanand's Declaration Gerald Moreno banned from Wikipedia The Sathya Sai Organization's defender, Gerald 'Joe' Moreno From Gerald Moreno's webpage FAQ Predictable Gerald Moreno Evidence of the fanatical activist Moreno on the Internet Moreno's major distortion of Basava Premanand's Declaration Evidence of the fanatical activist Moreno on the Internet Gerald Moreno rants about pictures on-line Moreno and "copyright blathering" Moreno's major lie about linking to exposé websites Moreno's fundamentalist Christian slur campaign Moreno's 'senile dementia' slurs & irrationality Gerald Joe Moreno - untruth and lies Robert Priddy’s Series On Sathya Sai Baba Man, Gerald Moreno Gerald Moreno's personal details removed from vishvarupa.com Gerald Moreno and "oiling between the pubic area and the navel" Moreno as "sathyasaibaba" with smear campaign Joe Moreno's schoolyard tit-for-tat attacks 'Genital Oiling' by Sathya Sai Baba + video evidence Gerald Joe Moreno and genital oiling by Sai Baba Gerald Moreno backs lying saboteur M. K. Yachendra Moreno admits he is a web impostor More personal attacks by Gerald Joe Moreno Sathya Sai Baba Apologist Joe Moreno’s Random Personal Attack Style (1) Joe Moreno - massive internet abuse Sathya Sai Baba's front man on the Internet Sathya Sai Baba Love, Light and Spirituality Exposed Moreno and sexual abuse, denial and subterfuge Sathya Sai Organisation defended by proxy Sathyasaibaba in the shadows Copyright infringements by sathyasaibaba Gerald Joe Moreno (aka sathyasaibaba) dares not show his face. Why? sathyasaibaba, Munchausen and sick fantasies sathyasaibaba specious claims and self-defeating 'arguments' Cultic Labeling of Dissenters As “Disgruntled”. Sathya Sai Baba Case Sathyasaibaba scales up hate attacks on critics Terrorist-related Slurs Used By Sai Baba Internet Fanatic Sai Baba Hatchet Man Picks On A Young Child Sai Baba Internet Man - No Apology When Caught Using Anti-Semitism Slur Sai Baba Proxy Attacker of Ex-followers and the Media Proxy Defender of Sai Baba and SWARA Premananda sentence and Swami Premananda & Indian Government

Sathya Sai Baba constantly invites visitors to meet him

The master of denial in personal delusion, 'Joe' or Gerald Moreno, denies that Sathya Sai Baba has ever descended to the level of inviting anyone, let alone all and sundry, to visit him - as I have asserted elsewhere. This is quite absurd and a wilful twisting of the truth in accordance with his fanatical agenda - to deny every single criticism of Sathya Sai Baba (except those countless untruths and absurdities which are documented from Sai Baba's own words) , as the following statements by him demonstrate.  Here are some published quotations of Sathya Sai Baba's words:-

“Come and take Ananda”   p. 17 Vision of the Divine by Eruch Fanibunda. 

"If you feel that you too must have the experience or else you will not believe, well, come and experience. " Sathya Sai Speaks Vol. 3 p. 198

"Come empty-handed, or what am I to fill them with?" Sathya Sai Speaks Vol. 2 p.156

"Come, examine, experience" Sathya Sai Speaks Vol. 4 p. 227

Baba's call to suffering humanity stands out in its directness and simplicity: "Why fear when I am here? Come unto Me all ye who suffer!" Baba assures us" (Chapter 17) p. 220 Sathyam, Sivam, Sundaram Vol. 3 (see http://www.ineval.org/sai/Teachings/SathyamSivamSundaram/s1048.html)

"Come with clean hands/having renounced attachment" p. 239 Sathya Sai Speaks Vol. 5

"Come with empty hands & carry away My Prema"  p. 123 Sathya Sai Speaks Vol. 2

"Come with mean desires & you'll be disappointed" p. 284 Sathya Sai Speaks Vol. 2

"Come without full hands, or how can I fill them" p, 123 Sathya Sai Speaks Vol. 2

See Sai Baba's advice to direct earnest seekers of God to Puttaparthi p.70 Ch. 4 Sathyam, Sivam, Sundaram Vol.2 (attached scan)

In the early days, printed invitation were sent out to all and sundry... see two scans attached
 On his 60th birthday Sathya Sai Baba invited villagers to come to Prashanthi Nilayam to partake in the village project (which turned out to be a failure after a promising start). When the Sathya Sai Organization makes a general invitation to birthdays and other events, it is always in accordance with the wishes of Sathya Sai Baba himself. Nothing so important is done without his will.

 "The main event had been an invitation via the Sathya Sai Organization to send persons to visit Prashanti Nilayam and hear Baba give instructions on village improvement. At least several hundred persons came as village representatives from all around India , to whom the ashram offered free transport, free meals, darshans and other benefits. Laudable as this attempt to help India’s poverty-stricken and declining villages was, the activities dwindled rapidly down - after the small bonanza - to a handful of individuals here and there,it was a notable failure. Despite this, the Sathya Sai authorities and Organization continues to publicise it as a fact even thouhg it had long since ceased to exist!

Blogs exposing some of Gerald Joe Moreno's many deceptions

After several years of a major slur and libel campaign  by Gerald Joe Moreno against all visible critics of Sathya Sai Baba , a number of his targets have seen fit at last to refute his enormous number of distortions, deceptions and outright lies. His aim to flood out all critical articles on Internet search engines with his websites with hundreds of pages, a large number of web logs and countless entries on bulletin boards, portals which allow entries or comments has necessitated a response somewhat in kind. Gerald Moreno has no other known occupation than as an Internet troll. He lives in Las Cruces, New Mexico and uses many aliases such as  Equalizer, SS108, JM108, GM108, visvarupa108, sheilawaring, Joe Apodaco, etc. etc. His blog under the  name, no less, of  'sathyasaibaba' on  Love, Light & Spirituality (wordpress blog) has been made attractive to Sai Baba devotees, not least so that he can continue his despicably unloving, unspiritual and dark campaign of disinformation there. By posting under the name sathyasaibaba, that blog site confuses many as to who it really is who owns it and posts on it.

The following excerpt from Gerald Moreno´s original webpages at viashvarupa.com - screen capture from 2004 - proves that he was, according to the law of India, sexually molested by being oiled on the lower stomach in private by Sai Baba, who is widely accused of many such oilings, even by many followers today and admitted as such even by Sai Baba officials. Moreno denies that it was sexual abuse, but that is his subjective feeling only. It is a known form of "grooming" for sexual relations.

CLICK ON IMAGE ABOVE TO ENLARGE IT

The Gerald Joe Moreno dossier - part 1 Internet point man for defending Sai Baba and the Sathya Sai Organization first-line shows himself as a fanatical and aggressive cultist

The Gerald Moreno dossier - part 2 In deep psychological denial about being molested inappropriately, Moreno refutes every criticism of Sathya Sai Baba and his followers in the face of overwhelming evidence.

Gerald Moreno's internet profile and agenda  Moreno a former devotee and  a great admirer of Sathya Sai Baba and  claims he is not a devotee and is apparently not a member of the Sathya Sai Organization. He uses a considerable number of pseudonyms.

Moreno_slander_against_Robert_Priddy.htm Alan Kazlev was initially a supporter of Moreno's views, as far as he knew what they involved. This all changed as son as he defended Barry Pittard as an honourable person. Moreno began to attack him too. Kazlev write at length on Moreno and remarks 'Notice the bitter, angry, and insulting tone in Moreno's writing


Gerald Moreno firmly defends sex abusers and cover-up The smear campaigning web libeler defends convicted rapist and murderer Swami Premananda, and even Sathya Sai Baba while believing him to be a sex abuser!

Gerald Moreno's false claim about porn site postings In his continuing fanatical fake muck-raking campaign, Gerald Moreno falsely alleges I posted links to my web site on a porno site

Gerald Moreno: absurd screen cap fraud claims contra Priddy More triviality and contrivance from this well-known empty-headed fanatic who attacks all dissidents of Sai Baba, Muktananda, Ammachi etc. on a massive scale... without anything but distortion, diversions and lies.

Moreno's wilful deceptions about LSD and Robert Priddy Hoping to gain popularity by setting me up as a defender of drug use, which I am most certainly and provably not, Moreno continues his hollow and transparent deceptions and libels

Not a 'smear campaign' against Sathya Sai Baba Were my writings a smear campaign [which they are definitively not] they could be contested by Sathya Sai Baba legally. Yet no one has ever brought a suit against me, not even a lawyer's letter!

Gerald Moreno banned from Wikipedia Forced off Wikipedia by an indefinite ban unanimously voted by six administrators - see record of ban.

The Sathya Sai Organization's defender, Gerald 'Joe' Moreno Very Serious defamation attempt by Moreno withdrawn due to legal jeopardy. No apology from this bitter hate merchant!